rubriccpamrev


 * U. S. History I-CP Ms. Horn

**Rubric: Historical Fiction Project** ||

|| Student has used at least one research-based fact per entry but they may be more basic. || The facts in the entries are common knowledge or based on what we did in class. ||  There are many factual errors in the entries; entires are general, not fact-based || ||.
 * **Category** || **Excellent “A”** || **Good “B"** || **Mediocre “C”** || **Poor “D”** ||  ||
 * **Completes all aspects of the assignment** || Student completes all aspects of the assignment. || Student covered all aspects of the assignment, but in a more basic manner || Student is missing one or two aspects of the assignment || The project is incomplete ||
 * **Depth and Quality** || Student has used 2+ research-based facts per entry. I nformation is blended in well, not simply pasted in.
 * **Creativity** || Student has created an interesting, complex, and credible character. The character’s personality can be seen throughout the entries. || The character is consistent, but the personality is only partially integrated into the facts. || There are attempts at making a character, but the personality is inconsistent or not well integrated. || The character is unrealistic or has no personality. ||
 * **Appearance** || The Wiki looks great. Pictures are appropriate and have solid captions. They enhance the work . || The Wiki contains appropriate pictures but they are not a great fit. || Missing pictures or captions. Some images are not relevant. || Few if any pictures or captions OR pictures are inappropriate. ||
 * **Footnotes/ Citations** || Footnotes are properly placed and written in proper format. Links work. || Some errors or missing links. Yet overall it’s a good try. || Footnotes attempted but inadequate. Errors in format. || Missing many footnotes or links. ||
 * **Accuracy** || Diary is accurate and credible. Someone could have had all of these experiences. || Some errors in sequence. It’s not likely a person would have had this life. Factually accurate. || Many errors—either the information is inaccurate or the series of events is not credible. || Little is accurate; the author clearly didn’t understand the topic or time period. ||  ||